CVE-2025-20203

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) and Cisco Prime Infrastructure could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a sto

Severity
Medium 4.8
CVSS 3.1
Remote, needs privileges or user interaction what this means
Exploited
Not listed
EPSS
0.003
20.1th percentile
Discovered by
Vendor
Vendor-published field
Published
Apr 2, 2025
Assigned by cisco

Description

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) and Cisco Prime Infrastructure could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against users of the interface of an affected system. The vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by inserting malicious code into specific data fields in the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. {{value}} ["%7b%7bvalue%7d%7d"])}]]

Weakness: CWE-79

Affected products

Vendor Product Category Matched by
Cisco Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager Network & Security Management cna-assigner
Cisco Cisco Prime Infrastructure Network & Security Management cna-assigner
Vendor-reported products (2)
  • Cisco · Cisco Prime Infrastructure
  • Cisco · Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM)

Vendor advisory

cisco-sa-epnmpi-sxss-GSScPGY4

Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager and Cisco Prime Infrastructure Stored Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities

Cisco’s rating: Medium (advisory CVSS 6.1) · Published Apr 2, 2025

Bug IDs: CSCwi37231 , CSCwi55038 , CSCwi89264 , CSCwi89344 , CSCwi92642 , CSCwi95616 , CSCwm51867 , CSCwm66634 , CSCwm66949

The vendor’s rating applies to the whole advisory and can differ from this CVE’s own CVSS severity. Where this comes from

Something wrong here?