CVE-2024-20493

A vulnerability in the login authentication functionality of the Remote Access SSL VPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software cou

Severity
Medium 5.3
CVSS 3.1
Remote · no auth what this means
Exploited
Not listed
EPSS
0.005
44.0th percentile
Discovered by
Vendor
Vendor-published field
Published
Oct 23, 2024
Assigned by cisco

Description

A vulnerability in the login authentication functionality of the Remote Access SSL VPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to deny further VPN user authentications for several minutes, resulting in a temporary denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to ineffective handling of memory resources during the authentication process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets, which could cause resource exhaustion of the authentication process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to deny authentication for Remote Access SSL VPN users for several minutes, resulting in a temporary DoS condition.

Weakness: CWE-772

Affected products

Vendor Product Category Matched by
Cisco Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Check your version Firewall / NGFW cna-assigner
Cisco Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Check your version Firewall / NGFW cna-assigner
Vendor-reported products (4)
  • Cisco · Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
  • Cisco · Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software
  • cisco · adaptive_security_appliance_software
  • cisco · firepower_threat_defense_software

Vendor advisory

cisco-sa-asa-vpn-4gYEWMKg

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance and Firepower Threat Defense Software Remote Access SSL VPN Authentication Targeted Denial of Service Vulnerability

Cisco’s rating: Medium (advisory CVSS 5.3) · Published Oct 23, 2024

Bug ID: CSCwf34069

The vendor’s rating applies to the whole advisory and can differ from this CVE’s own CVSS severity. Where this comes from

Something wrong here?