CVE-2024-20357

A vulnerability in the XML service of Cisco IP Phone firmware could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to initiate phone calls on an affected device. This vulnerability exists because boun

Severity
Medium 5.9
CVSS 3.1
Remote · no auth what this means
Exploited
Not listed
EPSS
0.005
40.6th percentile
Discovered by
Third party
Vendor-published field
Published
May 1, 2024
Assigned by cisco

Description

A vulnerability in the XML service of Cisco IP Phone firmware could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to initiate phone calls on an affected device. This vulnerability exists because bounds-checking does not occur while parsing XML requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted XML request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to initiate calls or play sounds on the device.

Weakness: CWE-787

Affected products

Vendor Product Category Matched by
Cisco Cisco IP Phones Other Products cna-assigner
Vendor-reported products (14)
  • Cisco · Cisco IP Phones with Multiplatform Firmware
  • Cisco · Cisco PhoneOS
  • cisco · ip_phone_6871_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · ip_phone_6821_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · ip_phone_6851_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · ip_phone_7821_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · ip_phone_6861_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · ip_phone_6825_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · ip_phone_6841_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · ip_phone_7811_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · ip_phone_7841_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · ip_phone_7861_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · ip_phone_8800_series_with_multiplatform_firmware
  • cisco · video_phone_8875_firmware

Vendor advisory

cisco-sa-ipphone-multi-vulns-cXAhCvS

Cisco IP Phone 6800, 7800, and 8800 Series with Multiplatform Firmware Vulnerabilities

Cisco’s rating: High (advisory CVSS 7.5) · Published May 1, 2024

Bug IDs: CSCwi64037 , CSCwi64050 , CSCwi64064 , CSCwi64077 , CSCwi64082 , CSCwi64103

The vendor’s rating applies to the whole advisory and can differ from this CVE’s own CVSS severity. Where this comes from

Something wrong here?